The quality of a club deal is decided before subscription — while everything can still be verified and everything can still be declined. Here is the grid we apply to our own operations, phrased so that an investor can apply it to any file, including ours. Five controls, in order: any single one can disqualify.

I. The operation — does the thesis prove itself?

Everything starts with the study file: the asset, its actual market, the business plan, the assumptions one by one — and their downside scenario. Two non-negotiable demands: every numbered assumption must be sourced, and the adverse scenario must be written, not alluded to. A file that only shows the favourable case is not a study file: it is a pitch. Our due diligence practice details what that file must contain.

II. The operator — what do they stand to lose?

The most discriminating control. Three proofs to demand: documented, verifiable past operations; meaningful operator co-investment in the vehicle; remuneration whose essential part depends on the final result, not on fundraising. An operator who earns by raising rather than by succeeding is not aligned the same way — that does not make them dishonest, it makes your analysis more necessary.

III. The structure — is the perimeter clean?

One operation, one company: the dedicated vehicle isolates risk and keeps accounts legible. Verify: that the company carries ONLY this operation; that the articles and the pact exist and are delivered before subscription; that bank accounts are dedicated; that any shareholder loans are documented by agreement. A confused structure is rarely an accident — it is information.

IV. Governance and reporting — what will you see, what will you decide?

Every power must be written before entry: who decides on works, refinancing, the sale; which decisions require investor consent; who audits the accounts and how often. Reporting is not a courtesy but an organised obligation — frequency, content, access. Our text on club deal governance details who should decide what.

V. The exit — is the scenario written?

A club deal ends: through the sale of the asset, a refinancing, or another route provided in the pact. Demand that exit scenarios be written BEFORE entry — target horizon, extension conditions, decision rules in case of disagreement. A club deal's illiquidity is constitutive and accepted; the absence of an exit scenario never is.

What this grid does not do

It does not eliminate risk — no method can. It eliminates the operations that do not deserve study, and turns the others into informed decisions. That is precisely what a method is for: we retain only a small share of the projects we study, and every refusal proceeds from one of these five controls.

General, non-personalised information: a club deal is a long-term commitment carrying capital-loss risk; every situation calls for licensed advice.